|
ABSTRACT
SUBMISSION |
|
Guidelines
for preparation and submission of abstracts: |
-
Abstracts
(in English) will only be accepted online and submitted
by May 23rd, 2013.
No abstracts will be accepted after this deadline. The
Organizing Committee reserves the right to reject abstracts
written in inadequate English or containing orthographic
errors.
-
Submissions will be reviewed by the Scientific Committee,
according to directions of the Organizing Committee. This
Committee will verify the adequacy of the abstracts for
presentation at the congress and publication in the annals.
The authors’ preference in presentation for a poster,
oral or both, as well as the Session Topic must also be
included in the submission form.
-
The criteria for selection will be both scientific quality
and degree of general interest.
-
The author submitting an abstract must be registered in
the Congress. Please register before the abstract submission
deadline, May 23rd, 2013.
-
Registrants will be notified whether their abstract has
been accepted for oral presentation and/or poster presentation
or not selected for presentation.
-
Only one certificate will be issued per
abstract, stating the names of all authors and co-authors.
Attention:
Enter the data on the registration form (title; authors) in
the order they should appear on the certificate. |
|
FORMAT: |
-
Justify all text.
-
Title: Full Title in Bold Letters
- Author(s):
Full Name of Authors in Bold Letters
-
The presenting author’s name should be underlined
(same name as on the registration form). Names should
be separated by a semicolon. Each name should be followed
by the superscript number related to the affiliation.
- Institution:
Superscript number followed by Institution name.
-
Text: Subheadings (Introduction, Methods
and Results, Conclusion) in bold
-
Footnote: Indicate sources of financial support
- Abstracts
not complying with the above specifications will not be
accepted.
- Special
attention should be given to written English, as abstracts
containing spelling or grammatical mistakes will be rejected.
- Tables,
charts or other graphics may not be included and will be
removed before the review process if included.
- No
literature references should be cited as part of the abstract.
-
All abbreviations must be defined the first time they appear
in the text (but not in the title).
-
A template is included below.
|
|
ABSTRACT
PREPARATION: |
-
Software: Microsoft Word Maximum 2500 characters (including
spaces) for all subheadings.
- Margins:
right 2 cm and left 3 cm. Font: Arial 12, normal style,
use "symbol" font for special characters.
- Single
line spacing and no paragraph divisions.
- Insert
a single line between: title and author; authors and institution;
institution and text.
|
|
ABSTRACT
SUBMISSION: |
Abstracts
must be submitted online by May 23rd, 2013, through the website
www.jzbrasil.com/congressos/toxinologia/
and classified by one of the areas listed below:
-
Antivenoms
- Amphibians toxins
-
Caterpillar toxins and envenomation
-
Clinical aspects of scorpion envenomation
-
Clinical aspects of snake envenomation
-
Clinical aspects of spider envenomation
-
Drug design based on venom components
-
Marine toxins
-
Plant toxins
-
Scorpion toxins
-
Snake toxins
-
Spider toxins
-
Toxin genomics
-
Toxin proteomics
-
Toxins and evolution
-
Toxins and haemostasis
-
Toxins and inflammation
-
Toxins and ion channels
-
Toxins and pain
-
Toxins from microbes
-
Venomous animals biology
|
|
TEMPLATE: |
Title
Complete
Name of the Main Author¹; Complete Name of the Second
Author²; Complete Name of the Last Author¹
¹Institution;
²Institution
Introduction:
Specify the following order: Brief statement of the problem
and state-of-the-art of the scientific subject, importance
of the study and Objectives. Methods and Results:
This item must contain a brief description of the methods
used in the work and the corresponding results. It is important
that the results are expressed as means ± variances
(standard deviation, standard error, etc). Values for “n”
should also be given. Conclusion: The abstract
must end with a brief conclusion. Only abstracts in standard
written English will be accepted.
Financial support: Use the last line of the
abstract to acknowledge financial support.
|
|
ABSTRACT
REVIEWING: |
All
contributions to the XI Congress of the Pan-American Section
of the International Society on Toxinology and XII Congress
of the Brazilian Society of Toxinology will require the submission
of an abstract, and a rigorous review procedure will be undertaken
to maintain the highest scientific quality of the congress.
All submitted abstracts will be reviewed according to the
following criteria:
- the
work makes a significant and original contribution to the
field;
-
the scientific content falls within the scientific scope
of the meeting;
-
the abstract complies with the submission instructions.
The
contributors should indicate the presentation preference (oral
and/or poster) and the category to which they would like to
be considered under. |
|
ABSTRACT
REVIEW: |
The
abstracts will be reviewed by the Scientific Committee.
A score will be assigned based on the following assessment
criteria for scientific content:
5 - Ground breaking research of outstanding quality and
vision in the field;.
4 - An innovative perspective on current understanding;
high quality research providing new insights; a major development
in the field; the exploitation of new scientific and health-care
developments, unreported in the Toxinology field; advancing
our understanding of Toxinology field;
3 - An interesting and important addition, helping the continued
development of the field;
2 - A modest addition to the field, contributing to the
development of a specific area;
1 - Work demonstrating little scientific innovation over
and above current published work; lacking scientific data,
argument or foundation.
Abstracts with score less than 2.5 from
the mean value of the scores will be rejected.
The reviewers will also take the following
matters into consideration in their assessment of the abstract.
-
The abstract is written in clear and acceptable English
with few syntax and spelling mistakes;
-
The abstract follows the guidelines in terms of content
and format;
-
Sufficient data is clearly presented and/or analyzed,
is adequately discussed and appropriate conclusions drawn.
Failure to comply with these simple guidelines
will affect the assessment score and may result in the rejection
of an abstract.
|
|
|